(photo credit: Ruth Orkin)

I always loved this picture of Switzer winning the ’74 NYC Marathon. It was still such a rare thing for a woman to run a marathon that Kathrine Switzer won in 3:07:29. In fact, it was such an oddity for women to run at all, that Switzer had to wear a tennis dress, partly because there were no running clothes for women and partly because she felt obligated to look pretty in an athletic event dominated and ruled by men.

Best of all, though, are the expressions on the faces of those watching Switzer win. The men, for the most part, look impressed, amused, or curious. They’re clapping, shouting encouragement. In sharp contrast are the expressions of the two women on the right. At best, they look jealous. At worst, they look downright hostile, even disgusted. In her book Marathon Woman, Switzer uses that picture to illustrate her experience as an emerging distance runner in the relative No Woman’s Land of the 60s and early 70s. Basically, men supported her, women did not.

Considering that the most famous picture of Kathrine Switzer is the one of Jock Semple in a pit bull rage, trying to body slam her out of the Boston Marathon because, damn it, it’s a manly man event for men only, the above picture is kind of surprising. Or not. Thirty-six years later, women often still do not support one another in running (or any number of things) in the same way that men support, admire, and even obsess over one another’s running. Why? I suppose there are any number of interesting, historical, social, boring as whaleshit, psychological, emotional reasons, but I’m not up for writing a dissertation at this very moment.

I will say, however, that many women are still nervous about taking their running too seriously or appearing too knowledgable about it. It might look bad. They might grow a beard or lose ovaries. And everbody can just calm down right  now, because I said “many,” not “all.” I know plenty of competitive women who are so serious about their running that I’m Daisy Lah de Dah Here I Go for a Little Jog!  in comparison. But I know far more women who shy away from being competitive, repeat the inane mantra: “I have one speed—slow!”, who invariably assume that only men can give solid running advice or coach, and who consider running, as a sport and not a weight-loss device, to be a man’s realm.

From what I can remember, this lack of confidence and camaraderie among women was one of the reasons Switzer started the Avon Running events for women only. Of course, the larger reason, in 1978, was to encourage women to run, to make them feel included in something that had historically been a Men Only pasttime. After all, it would still be another 6 years (six!) before the IOC would sighingly admit that maybe women were, in fact, strong enough to compete in the Olympic Marathon. And , so, it’s only been within our lifetimes (unless you’re under 26, in which case, bite me) that women have been taken even moderately seriously in the sport of running.

But now it’s 2010. Millions of women run. Last year, more women than men ran half marathons in the U.S. Obviously, women don’t feel unwelcome. So, the question has been asked, why are there still women-only races? What’s the point?

I’d like to think that the point is the still-ongoing development of support and camaraderie among female athletes. Or even  as a stepping-stone to encouraging women to actually think of themselves as athletes, as strong and in charge of their bodies. This is still a rarity. And it’s one of the reasons there’s a Girls on the Run program, and not a Boys on the Run.

I also think that some women definitely appreciate the occasional break from running races with men. It makes it a totally different kind of event. In my billion years of racing, I’ve experienced everything from guys giving me unwanted non-stop advice for miles, commenting on my footfall and stride and shorts, cutting me off, spitting on me, announcing “Oh No! I’m getting chicked!” and giving themselves a coronary to beat me at the finish line. That being said, that is the exception. Mostly, men have been overwhelmingly supportive. But, you know, it would still be nice to run a race or two a year without men. Sorry.

It’s been suggested that having women-only races is “divisive.” I’m not sure how. I can’t think of a lot of sports where men and women compete together anyway. Road racing is kind of an anomaly. A good one. But a couple of women’s races a year (for the above-mentioned reasons) is not going to lead to any kind of major Division ‘O the Genders.

On the other hand, a lot of these Women Only races depress me. Here’s why:

Too much pink and giggling and full makeup and Everyone’s a Winner! and crumpets and peach-infused tea at the finish line and goodie bags with lace doilies. (Okay, I made that last one up.)

I mean, come on! Really? Many of the promoters of these events have gone entirely out of their way to avoid presenting any of the participants as even remotely competitive or (gasp!) serious. I’m not saying that the race flyers need to display a panorama of exhausted women with runny noses and death grimaces careening to the finish line, but a picture or two of women actually doing something wacky like RACING AT A RACE might be nice. I’m sure I’m not alone (among women or men) in wanting to see female runners portrayed as something closer to athletes than to laughy daffy sorority sisters.



28 thoughts on “Seriously?

  1. Boring as whaleshit? That’s a classic. I’m stealing that.

    So, does this mean you aren’t interested in getting a group of girls together to wear matching pink singlets, pink tutus, and pink ribbons in our hair for the Women’s Half this fall? WTF?

  2. Yeah, I stole Boring as Whaleshit from someone else, so feel free to steal it from me.

    See you at the Women’s Half! Don’t smile or try to be pleasant to me, as I will be stomping around trying to look as serious as possible. In all black. With a Breathe-Right Strip.

  3. I bet there is a big market of women who would, in fact, be inspired by “a panorama of exhausted women with runny noses and death grimaces careening to the finish line.” I mean this from a purely business perspective. It is a largely untapped market.

  4. great post. i love that picture of k.v. switzer. 🙂 i agree that a lot of women seem to be afraid of admitting they are competitive. actually, i agree with the entire post. i feel so lucky that i have a really supportive group of women (and men, too) to run with. it’s a treasure.

  5. your just flushtrated on account off those girls in pink skort’s run more fasterly than you.

  6. I don’t dig the female only races. Call me a misogynist. I don’t really care. Im pretty sure we have testosterone to thank for bulling through a finish line. Estrogen just makes you cry like you summitted Mt. Everest when all you really did was run for 3 hours or 4 or 5.

    Meserat Defar said it best after a 14:46 5K when she said, “anybody wearing shorts is my competition.”

  7. Hi Tayna–I’m delighted to be the subject of your latest blog, and to hear your opinions. Mine are the same as they always have been: the road is big enough for all of us, males and females, fast and slow, competitive or contemplative. When I organized 400 Avon races in 27 countries for a million women, it was for all types of women, and to convince the IOC that women deserved their own Olympic Marathon, an important athletic goal as well as global message of female capability. It IS interesting, isn’t it, how that photo still evokes so many reactions. It is a famous photo by legendary photographer Ruth Orkin; would you be so kind as to photo-credit her? Thank you! My best, Kathrine

    1. OMG.

      Kathrine Switzer is actually commenting here. I am honored, flabbergasted, and sheepish.

      Thank you so much… For everything you’ve done and for inexplicably reading my blog. On my way to photo-credit Ms. Orkin….

  8. I got chastised by a friend a couple months ago. She has discovered that “running without worrying about time is so much more fun! It is stupid to get competitive and care about your time. You need to chill and you would enjoy it more!”

    Fun. I’ll show her fun.

  9. PS: Here’s a sign that things have improved. I was thrilled to meet Lisa Smith-Batchen. She’s run races that I would never attempt, because I’d get to the hospital (or the morgue) before the finish line.

  10. I would say this applies a lot more to the casual female runner.

    I ran for a D1 college and bonded a lot with my teammates. That’s one thing I really miss about the D1 level, as tough as it might have been sometimes. Most of the runners have the same “shark like” mentality, whether they be male or female. I thrived off the competition and some of my best runs were running as a pack with my teammates or getting through a tough interval workout with them etc. Now that I’m out of college, while it was a lot of mileage and work, I really miss having that training atmosphere of so many serious runners just like me who wanted to improve to be the best that they could. Unfortunately, at local road races I sometimes hop in or drop by on, the attitude isn’t quite as prevalent and I agree with your point here: “But I know far more women who shy away from being competitive, repeat the inane mantra: “I have one speed—slow!”, who invariably assume that only men can give solid running advice or coach, and who consider running, as a sport and not a weight-loss device, to be a man’s realm.”

    It is frustrating and I hope that as we progress forward as a society, it will be considered “socially acceptable” for women to be the same way.

  11. I would also add that it seems like it is “socially acceptable” for only faster women to show competitiveness, etc. (and even in some cases maybe not)… hence a bit of a double standard.

  12. “Yeah, I stole Boring as Whaleshit from someone else …”

    Yes. You did.

    “giving themselves a coronary to beat me at the finish line ….”

    It was actually a minor stroke, not a coronary.

  13. i just noticed you had 26 comments on this post and so i thought how cool it would be to have 26.2 comments. 26.2!! GET IT?! and so consider this my .2 worth.

  14. I stumbled across your blog when Googling “the problem with women’s marathons” or something like that. I think this post is spot on. I like the idea of a women’s only race, but I am not into the idea of running with a feather boa or tutu on. The thing that got my ire up this morning was a local woman’s half announcing that they’d have a “picture perfect” station at mile 13 (yes, .2 miles from the finish) with mirrors, lipstick and brushes available so you can look “your best” in your finish line photo. Wish I was joking.

    Love your blog… I have added it to my Google Reader.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s